DECISION 01
Lead with comparable details
- Why it mattered
- Price alone does not determine the right flight.
- Design response
- Give timing, duration and stops a stable hierarchy beside price.
LVL 01 — AKASA AIR
Redesigning the flight booking experience around comparison, clarity and decision-making.

01 / CONTEXT
Flight booking is fundamentally a comparison and decision-making problem. Users need to compare price, timing, duration, stops, baggage, seats and fare rules without getting overwhelmed.
02 / TENSION
What deserves attention first — and what can wait? The experience needed to preserve useful detail without presenting every variable at once.
I wasn't just designing a booking flow. I was designing the decision around the flight.
03 / PROCESS
DESIGN FOCUS — THE WORKFLOW BELOW SHOWS THE INTENDED PATH THROUGH THE PRODUCT.
04 / RATIONALE
DECISION 01
DECISION 02
DECISION 03
05 / EXPERIENCE
KEY CONSIDERATION — VISUALS ARE CONCEPTUAL PLACEHOLDERS, NOT ORIGINAL PROJECT SCREENS.

06 / OUTCOME
OUTCOME DATA WAS NOT PROVIDED FOR THIS PROJECT.
This case study documents the design focus and intended experience without making claims about measured results, stakeholder feedback or usability findings.
07 / REFLECTION
Validate the information hierarchy across different traveller types and explore how historical price context could support decision confidence.